Visit the official Doctor Who website

Visit the official Doctor Who website
Look to the future

Asylum seekers...

Asylum seekers...
Refuge of the Daleks

Doctor Who picture resource

Doctor Who picture resource
Roam the space lanes!

Explore the Doctor Who classic series website

Explore the Doctor Who classic series website
Step back in time

Infiltrate The Hub of Doctor Who spin-off Torchwood

Infiltrate The Hub of Doctor Who spin-off Torchwood
Armed and extremely dangerous

Investigate The Sarah Jane Adventures

Investigate The Sarah Jane Adventures
Fearless in the face of adversity

Call on Dani’s House

Call on Dani’s House
Harmer’s a charmer

Intercept the UFO fabsite

Intercept the UFO fabsite
Defending the Earth against alien invaders!

Uncover the secrets of the Dollhouse

Uncover the secrets of the Dollhouse
Programmable agent Echo exposed!

Hell’s belles

Hell’s belles
Naughty but nice

Love Exposure

Love Exposure
Flash photography!

Primeval portal

Primeval portal
Dressed to kill or damsels in distress?

Charmed, to be sure!

Charmed, to be sure!
The witches of San Francisco

Take on t.A.T.u.

Take on t.A.T.u.
All the way from Moscow

Proceed to the Luther website

Proceed to the Luther website
John and Jenny discuss their next move

DCI Banks is on the case

DCI Banks is on the case
You can bet on it!

On The Grid with Spooks

On The Grid with Spooks
Secret agents of Section D

Bridge to Hustle

Bridge to Hustle
Shady characters

Life on Ashes To Ashes

Life on Ashes To Ashes
Coppers with a chequered past

Claire’s no Exile

Claire’s no Exile
Goose steps

Vexed is back on the beat!

Vexed is back on the beat!
Mismatched DI Armstrong and bright fast-tracker Georgina Dixon

Medium, both super and natural

Medium, both super and natural
Open the door to your dreams

Who’s that girl? (350-picture Slideshow)

Monday, 9 April 2007

The Taming of Doctor Who



Whereas I felt the opening story of the current series of “Doctor Who” bettered its predecessors, this year’s reworking of “The Unquiet Dead”, retitled “The Shakespeare Code”, seemed to lack the magic it was reassuringly denying. I wish Executive Producer Russell T Davies would break away from the formulaic “Doctor Who” he is regurgitating. He takes the first three episodes from his original run, jumbles them up just a bit, and dumps them straight back into place for each new season! What’s the point of having his entire team straining at the bit to produce something visually spectacular when all the ideas are old hat? It might have been more surprising, for example, if the witches had eventually turned out to actually be the Gelth, or their ancestors if we have to be so linear in a time-travel drama, trying to break through in an earlier period, with the revelation being the need for the involvement of a writer to achieve this. Hence the original participation of Dickens, and latterly the Bard; the reasoning being that creativity in the written idea can bring about the creation of life.

As it was, the biggest surprise of the second episode was the brief involvement of Donald Pleasence’s daughter Angela, at the story’s close, as Queen Elizabeth. I hadn’t heard about her casting and checked the closing credits to make sure I was right because I wondered, immediately, why an actress with her track record would agree to take on such a small part. She was Nigel Hawthorne’s wife, Susan Grantly, in “The Barchester Chronicles”, admittedly a quarter of a century ago, and the drug-addled Molly, mother of golden-haired Eppie, in “Silas Marner: The Weaver of Raveloe”, to name but two of her most memorable roles, and perhaps the most accomplished player in “The Shakespeare Code”! That’s not to take anything away from the two main guest stars. They were both on fine form though I thought Christina Cole the better of the two. That might simply be because she was the baddie, and got to chew the scenery, but Dean Lennox Kelly had most of the best lines, not surprisingly as they were nearly all written by a certain William Shakespeare!!

The effect of Queen Elizabeth’s entrance and attitude, upon this viewer, was not dissimilar to that induced by Donna at the end of last season (continuing into the Christmas “special”). A silly woman in an even sillier frock giving the poor young Doc a piece of her mind and him the appearance of a harried man eager to scarper. Any serious intent was thus scuppered, undermined once again, in favour of a cheap laugh. It was the same last week with the shrill Annalise designed to hit the same raw nerve as Jackie. The government must love this programme’s recycling policy! What is it with RTD and this strange view he has of women? I reckon he only made this episode in order to have a few of the male extras in skirts down on film for posterity! You’re a bit late there Russell, me old chum, as John Nathan Turner’s beaten you to that one. Take a closer look at “Remembrance of the Daleks”.

A man drowning on dry land was done in the Jon Pertwee story “The Mind of Evil” whilst an arrow piercing the door of the TARDIS was last seen in “Silver Nemesis”! Then it was handled more evocatively and on a much smaller budget. Mr Davies has gone on record as saying this series is more of the same as his last two, only bigger. I think he said bigger and not better which is a shame as the two are definitely not the same thing. Different and smaller might’ve meant more interesting. In “Doctor Who Confidential”, immediately following “The Shakespeare Code” over on BBC Three, the evening’s episode was likened to a Hammer horror film. Which one, I wonder? All the ones I know are beautifully-gothic romances, strong in the fright department, and preferably with a music score by James Bernard. Vampires inspired by Mr Stoker with plenty of bite! Now, where’s my copy of “Taste the Blood of Dracula”?..!!

7 comments:

Steve said...

I have to agree with you. We found it very predictable plot-wise... saw a lot of it coming from a mile off which is not what you want from Dr. Who. My boy enjoyed it though - I guess if nothing else it was a nice family romp for Easter. Not sure if that's an endorsement worth having though!

Stuart Douglas said...

Sounds like you did enjoy it far less than me :)

Old Cheeser said...

You do sound disappointed with it Tim - sorry to hear that. I hadn't really noticed the recycling thing and must admit it hadn't crossed my mind. Although now thinking about it I can see what you mean about the regurgitation of the same episode concepts - one story set on modern day Earth, another in some period of Earth's past, and another in the future...true! There's nothing wrong with having stories set in these periods but for variety's sake I guess they could be spread out better throughout the season.

I didn't have any major problems with Shakespeare Code, rather, I really enjoyed it!! The period recreation was excellent, the story was well-paced (whilst having room for a fair number of slower, "contemplative" scenes) and there were lots of good scenes. I liked the witty banter and Shakespearean in-jokes.

As for Dean Lennox Kelly, I wasn't entirely sure about his portrayal of Shakey - not that he didn't give the part his best shot but there was something about his accent which didn't quite work. But I liked the strategy of making him more down to earth and normal, rather than some kind of snootie RSC luvvie. Christina Cole was a great villainess and attractive with it.

The relationship between the Dr and Martha continued to entertain and I also liked her flirtation with Shakespeare. And the Doc's comment about 57 academics punching the air was very funny...

With regard to some of bits you picked up on (the drowning man, the arrow piercing the TARDIS door) these could be looked on as recycling, but don't you think you're being quite picky? Particularly in as much as these stories were a long time ago, and young viewers of Dr Who wouldn't even remember these things (unlike oldsters such as us?!)So surely "recycling" is a slightly inevitable?

And I liked the Queen Elizabeth cameo at the end! I'll be interested to find out what her problem with the Dr is!

TimeWarden said...

Glad your son enjoyed it, Steve. I expect my nephew did too! Like you, I found “The Shakespeare Code” predictable, so much so that I guessed, even before the episode began, that an incantation in the play would be the key to bringing the aliens into our world. The trailer gave it away in stating the play must not be performed! That’s why I called that post “The Play’s the Thing”. It was my way of passing on what I’d already deduced.

Thanks for the commiserations, Simon. Glad you enjoyed the episode, as well. It isn’t so much the reusing of classic “Who” ideas I see as recycling, more the repetition of new “Who” season structure, individual story structures, concepts within a story etc. For example, the Judoon may, from the lack of neck up, appear slightly Sontaran-like but their shoulders and arms, and the way they march in formation and the sound they make when so doing, are definitely last year’s Cybermen.

When you watch your Season Two box set, lookout for the fairy lights at the end of “New Earth” reused when Jackie walks down the stairs in “Rise of the Cybermen”. Marvel at how Toby’s magnifying glass in “The Impossible Planet” finds its way into Torchwood HQ for the season finale! Wonder how the room in which the Dalek sphere is held looks remarkably similar to the torture chamber in Utah!! There are plenty of others and it didn’t need repeated viewing to spot them. With this bigger budget, can’t they better disguise props and locations?

Queen Elizabeth’s problem with the Doctor will be the same as Donna’s. I don’t mean she’s about to be married when the Doc whisks her away but she’s there to be a pain in the proverbial. She’s the generic thorn in the Doctor’s side. I don’t care about the particulars because whatever they are will be as instantly forgettable and uninteresting as those of “The Runaway Bride”. “Doctor Who” has become parochial. Even at the end of the 80s, which so many seem to despise, it was still about big universal issues.

Fans complain Peri whined. No more than Donna did. Less, in fact. I remember you saying people today wouldn’t stand for a whining companion and yet they’re happy with Tate in the TARDIS?!! Give me a companion that screams in fear at the first sight of a monster over one who snivels like a love struck teenager any day of the week. For a moment, I almost expected the Doc to dump Martha and run off with Liz I!!! Enough Monarchs already. We’ve had Victoria, Liz I, Coronation of Liz II. Enough authors already. Dickens, now Shakespeare. The Doc’s met royalty before, walking her corgis, raising his panama as a mark of respect. He’s met H G and Tom’s Doctor claimed to have met Shakespeare.

RTD’s idea of bigger is only regards the special effects. They are used in an attempt to disguise the fact that the stories themselves are much smaller in scope than almost anything in the classic series. And, why has the Doctor become such a wally? I’ve just been watching the young Peter Davison giving a master-class in how to play the character. I don’t blame Tennant. If Davies wrote serious I’m sure Tennant would give a serious performance instead of standing on one leg, shaking his radiation-soaked trainer, whilst beating out a samba! If I’m brutally honest, that’s RTD’s bachelor-class in how to destroy a much-loved character simply to make him accessible to a modern no-brainer audience of Lil Chris loving ten-year-olds whose sole response is to claim the programme “Awesome”!!!

Steve said...

Oh my God, is Lil Chris still going? I recall slagging him off before Christmas in the expectation his career would be dead and buried by the New Year!

I agree totally with your synopsis about Dr Who and Tennant's performance. Don't get me wrong - I like Tennant - but his buffoonery is getting to be more like an annoying facial tick than the eccentricity of genius. Effects and big budgtes mean eff all - the writing is the thing! Get that right and the rest will follow!

Karen said...

I have to admit that I didn't notice most of the similarities while watching it the first time. Too excited by the fact that I am watching Dr Who I think. I did notice them the second time round though. I still liked it though.

Do you not think that the same can be said about the Daleks though? I love the Daleks as much as anyone I just think that they are being over used. Too much of a good thing! We are seeing another famous British author and another angry monarch and then more Dalek stories. Isn't that the same (sorry, I'm going back to something I have mentioned before).

Despite that though I did enjoy it and I have to admit I want to know why Queen Elizabeth1 is so angry with the Doctor.

TimeWarden said...

Unfortunately, and a very big unfortunately it is too, Lil Chris is indeed still “on the scene”!

I like Tennant too, Steve. I was optimistic before he began! But he needs to calm down and stay away from the E numbers!! Tom Baker’s Doctor indulged in all sorts of eccentric nonsense, and could be rude too, yet he carried it off with such charm that it didn’t often overshadow the story. Russell wants Mr T to get wacky as often as possible by the look of it!!!

When the present new “Who” furore dies down, I think people will wonder what all the fuss was about. Modern cultural references aplenty will ensure this era dates very quickly and in twenty years time viewers will be comparing their latest Doctor to Tom. And people will still be oblivious, for various reasons (age, archival availability), to the fact that “Doctor Who” was even better when it was in black and white!

I’m not sure whether or not the Daleks are being used too much, Karen. In terms of screen time, hardly at all but their next adventure is coming rather hot on the heels of their last. Apart from “Dalek”, they have really only appeared, so far, in the last episode of each season. That’s three episodes out of thirty. It seems like more because of the teasers and the previous episode’s cliff-hangers in the two-part stories, I think.

Having decided on the Daleks’ further involvement, this season, it is necessary for them to appear sooner rather than later to avoid the same excessive repetition at the series’ conclusion that we are still experiencing at the series’ beginning. It also might have something to do with the fact that the BBC have the rights to use them for three years only, after which new negotiations will be required to use them in “Doctor Who” in the future.

I’m hoping that, this two-parter, the Daleks will be used throughout both episodes. Their return isn’t a surprise so no need to wait until halfway through the story for them to appear. That would be a break from tradition so should appeal to RTD! It’s time for a truly full-blooded Dalek story!!

It’s interesting that “Gridlock” is set in New New York while the Dalek story following moves to New York. I wonder if they’re connected somehow and will seem more like a three-parter which would be really interesting. Similarly, it would also be interesting if episode eleven runs straight into the two-part finale so that the Captain Jack stories view as a three-parter and John Simm given a full two episodes screen time. Just some thoughts. It’s what I’d do if I had Russell’s job and was using his bag of tricks!